![]() |
Bret Schwartz paced the league with 37.15 RC in 2010 |
For those of you who aren't familiar with the term "sabermetrics" or the more advanced stats, here's a quick rundown. The idea is that the simple stats every baseball fan is familiar with all have little flaws that make them faulty or not quite as useful as they could be. For example, you can use AVG to determine if someone is a good hitter, but you're neglecting how often they walk, sacrifice, get extra-base hits, etc. You could look at RBI as a measure of productiveness, but then you're not just looking at one player but also the guys who bat -- and either reach base or fail to do so -- in the order ahead of him. At the end of the day, though, the only thing that matters is how many runs a player helped put on the board, regardless of how he did it. Runs Created tries (rather successfully) to isolate one player's performance, and at the same time, include all aspects of a player's offense. If you read last year's post, I used the exact same formula that I did for the 2009 players, including the constant that I derived empirically to adjust to the ABL.
So here (after the jump!) is the table of the top 25 ABL batters in Runs Created in 2010:
2010 ABL Runs Created - Top 25 | ||
Player | Team | RC |
Schwartz, Bret | Miners | 37.15 |
Mee, Andy | Miners | 35.82 |
Grimes, Tyler | Oilers | 27.23 |
Bermudez, Pablo | Miners | 27.15 |
DeBiasse, Nick | Miners | 25.58 |
Thigpen, Wesley | Miners | 24.78 |
Parnell, Aaron | Fire | 24.19 |
Hairgrove, Trevor | Pilots | 23.84 |
Terry, Cody | Fire | 22.13 |
Serritella, Chris | Bucs | 21.58 |
Ruch, Tyler | Miners | 21.17 |
Watson, Will | Fire | 20.89 |
Wisdom, Patrick | Oilers | 20.13 |
Vincej, Zach | Bucs | 19.74 |
Mathews, Ryan | Fire | 19.40 |
Gebhart, Ryan | Oilers | 19.18 |
Piscotty, Stephen | Oilers | 18.80 |
Medina, Martin | Panners | 18.71 |
Schoch, Mark | Fire | 18.59 |
Tauchman, Mike | Panners | 18.34 |
Chung, Derrick | Panners | 17.31 |
Crank, Coley | Bucs | 17.28 |
Maitland, Tim | Pilots | 16.41 |
Sikorski, Jesse | Panners | 16.39 |
Now that we have a year behind us, it's interesting to look back and see how this compares to last year. I had a discussion with an anonymous commenter (sorry I can't give you better credit for your input...you'll have to post with a name next time!) on a previous Odds & Ends post about how Drew Heid compares to Bret Schwartz, considering they both posted averages over .400 in 2009 and 2010 respectively. The reader commented that Heid was so far ahead of Schwartz that the two didn't belong in the same sentence. Well, I think Schwartz is a heck of a ball player, but as far as offense goes his league-leading 37.15 runs created on the season are still a pretty good tick off Heid's 52.91. The stats don't lie, and I have to concede this point to the aforementioned reader.
While we're on the subject, here's a little something to put things into perspective. The 162-game MLB season is about 3.68 times longer than the current-era ABL season. Last year Albert Pujols led the majors with 165 runs created. Extrapolating the above numbers, Heid would have hit 195 over the course of a full MLB year; Schwartz would have had 137.
In addition to the standard runs created stat, I invented a little statistic: at-bats per run created. It's just like it sounds, a measurement of the number of at-bats required, on average, for a hitter to create a run. A lower number is better, in this case. There are two reasons I did this, and two problems that you should be aware of with this statistic before taking it with anything other than a grain of salt. I wanted to have an "average" stat to compensate for players who only made it up for half the season, and I also wanted something to involve the at-bat statistic so I could juxtapose it against AVG. The problems with this are that half a season is something like 20 games (though the cut-off point for players considered was 40 plate appearances, FYI) so there's the small sample size, and the using at-bats introduces some of the wonkiness that RC tries to take out of the equation. So, in other words, this statistic is just for illustrative purposes and isn't perfect. Here's the numbers...
2010 ABL At-Bats per RC - Top 25 (vs. AVG) | |||
Player | Team | AB/RC | AVG |
Schwartz, Bret | Miners | 4.23 | 0.420 |
Bermudez, Pablo | Miners | 4.82 | 0.351 |
Mee, Andy | Miners | 4.83 | 0.353 |
Montalbano, Paul | Pilots | 5.20 | 0.282 |
Parnell, Aaron | Fire | 5.54 | 0.299 |
Thigpen, Wesley | Miners | 5.65 | 0.307 |
Grimes, Tyler | Oilers | 5.73 | 0.288 |
Mathews, Ryan | Fire | 5.98 | 0.284 |
Ruch, Tyler | Miners | 6.00 | 0.323 |
Hege, Ryan | Oilers | 6.01 | 0.357 |
Hairgrove, Trevor | Pilots | 6.04 | 0.304 |
DeBiasse, Nick | Miners | 6.37 | 0.325 |
Moczygemba, Reagan | Miners | 6.45 | 0.328 |
Medina, Martin | Panners | 6.58 | 0.272 |
Serritella, Chris | Bucs | 6.86 | 0.304 |
Terry, Cody | Fire | 6.87 | 0.263 |
Gebhart, Ryan | Oilers | 7.04 | 0.222 |
Watson, Will | Fire | 7.13 | 0.322 |
Schoch, Mark | Fire | 7.26 | 0.311 |
Pippin, Quinn | Miners | 7.37 | 0.226 |
Lyon, David | Miners | 7.41 | 0.269 |
Crank, Coley | Bucs | 7.46 | 0.248 |
Piscotty, Stephen | Oilers | 7.55 | 0.289 |
Dickson, Okoyea | Pilots | 7.60 | 0.250 |
The main point I wanted to make with this table -- other than, again, giving some name-space to players who did well in limited plate appearances -- is that you can hit for a low average and still be an above-average offensive threat. Case in point: Ryan Gebhart of the Oilers' created a run every 7.04 at-bats but hit only .222, while the Fire's Will Watson created a run every 7.13 at-bats while hitting .322 (100 points better).
That should give you stat-heads something to chew on for a bit. Last year I used the xERA stat to look at pitchers, so I don't see any reason why I won't do that again this year. If things go as planned, I'll keep turning out some write-ups of other advanced statistics throughout the off-season; I'm still just getting a handle on the sabermetrics-type stuff myself, but like pretty much everything else on this blog, I figure the best way to learn is to get my hands dirty and go for it. So look for some more interesting statistical analysis posts all off-season.
Don't fall into the trap of sabermatriculationisticisms jjack!
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, these stats don't tell me anything I can't tell myself by watching games religiously and making my own observations. I just don't think you can accurately judge a player without actually seeing him play. Sabermetrics tell me nothing about how a player can use his body to create strength.
Well, I agree with you to an extent. I do think that scouting is the more important aspect of the game at this level. But you know, people are always going to look at stats...they might as well get some GOOD stats. And at the end of the day, I don't think you can take either statistics or scouting info on their own, you've got to take them both as a whole. That's just my opinion though. But toward that end I hope to cover the stats, the scouting, and the "human interest" aspects of the game.
ReplyDeleteI respect that, jjack. You make a good point.
ReplyDeleteThanks. Your input is always appreciated around here.
ReplyDelete